Fair use lets artists use copyrighted material without permission in certain cases. Here’s what you need to know:
- Fair use applies to commentary, criticism, or parody
- Courts consider 4 factors: purpose, nature of work, amount used, and market impact
- No clear-cut rules exist – each case is judged individually
Key guidelines for fair use in visual arts:
- Writing about art: Use what’s needed to make your point
- Art education: Show works to help students learn
- Creating art: Transform existing work to add new meaning
- Museums: Use copyrighted works to explain exhibitions
- Digital archives: Make copies to preserve and share online
Remember:
- Fair use is complex and evolving
- When in doubt, get permission or consult a lawyer
- Stay informed on latest court cases and best practices
| Context | Fair Use Guidelines |
|---|---|
| Writing | Use amount needed for analysis |
| Teaching | Show works to aid learning |
| Creating | Transform to add new meaning |
| Museums | Use to explain exhibitions |
| Archives | Copy to preserve and share |
Fair use balances creativity and copyright. Use it wisely to keep art thriving while respecting creators’ rights.
Related video from YouTube
4 Factors of Fair Use
Courts consider four key factors when deciding if using copyrighted material is fair use in visual arts:
1. Purpose of Use
Courts favor:
- Non-profit or educational uses
- Transformative uses adding new meaning
Example: Lauren Clay’s "Cloud on My Single-Mindedness" (2012) was fair use of David Smith’s "Cubi XXVII" due to its size, materials, and feminist commentary.
2. Type of Work
Courts are more likely to allow fair use of:
- Factual works over fictional ones
- Published works over unpublished ones
3. Amount Used
Less is usually better. But even small amounts can be an issue if it’s the work’s "heart."
Example: In Google v. Oracle, Google’s use of 0.4% of Java SE code was acceptable. But in Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, using 300 words (0.15%) of a manuscript wasn’t fair use because it was the book’s core.
4. Market Impact
Courts consider:
- If it hurts the original work’s sales
- Impact on potential markets
Example: In Harper & Row, the Supreme Court ruled that a 300-word excerpt likely hurt book sales, so it wasn’t fair use.
"The less you take, the more likely that your copying will be excused as a fair use." – Rich Stim, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center
There’s no set formula for fair use. Courts weigh these factors case-by-case. When in doubt, get permission or consult a lawyer.
Fair Use Guidelines for Visual Arts
The College Art Association (CAA) created a code to help visual arts pros handle copyright issues. Here’s how fair use works in different areas:
Writing About Art
You can use copyrighted works in your analysis if:
- It helps your point
- You use the right amount
Sometimes, you might need to show the whole artwork. That’s okay if it’s necessary for your analysis.
Art Education
Teachers can use fair use to make their lessons better:
- Show digital slides or videos in class
- Give students relevant images to use outside class
Just make sure it’s for your students and helps them learn.
Creating Art
Artists can use copyrighted stuff in new art if:
- It creates new meaning
- The use makes sense for the art
For example, Lauren Clay’s "Cloud on My Single-Mindedness" (2012) changed David Smith’s "Cubi XXVII" by making it smaller, using different materials, and adding a feminist twist.
Museum Practices
Museums can use copyrighted works for shows and educational stuff when:
- It helps explain the exhibition
- They use the right amount
Digital Archives
Institutions can make digital copies of copyrighted materials they own to:
- Keep them safe
- Let people see them online
Peter Jaszi, a copyright law expert, says: "The Code describes common situations in which there is a consensus within the visual arts community about practices to which fair use should apply."
| Context | Fair Use Guidelines |
|---|---|
| Writing About Art | Helps analysis, right amount used |
| Art Education | Helps teaching, just for students |
| Creating Art | Makes new meaning, makes sense for the art |
| Museum Practices | Helps explain exhibition, right amount used |
| Digital Archives | For keeping safe and showing online |
Fair use is flexible. If you’re not sure, check the CAA’s Code or ask a lawyer.
Unclear Fair Use Situations
Fair use in visual arts can be tricky. Many cases aren’t black and white, making it tough to know if a use is fair or not.
Evaluating Unclear Cases
When you’re not sure about fair use, think about these points:
1. Transformative use
The more you change the original work, the more likely it’s fair use. But it’s not always simple.
Take the 2023 Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith case. The Supreme Court said Warhol’s use of Goldsmith’s Prince photo wasn’t transformative enough. They stated:
"Transformative works must give the old work a new purpose and character beyond just derivative changes."
2. Purpose of use
Non-profit or educational use is more likely to be fair than commercial use. But there are exceptions.
3. Amount used
Using less of the original work helps your case. Sometimes, though, you need the whole thing.
4. Market impact
If your new work doesn’t hurt the market for the original, it’s more likely to be fair use.
When you’re unsure:
- Write down why you made your decision
- Talk it over with others
- Check out industry guidelines, like the Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for visual arts
Remember: Fair use is decided case-by-case. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer.
| Factor | More Likely Fair Use | Less Likely Fair Use |
|---|---|---|
| Transformative Use | Big changes, new meaning | Small changes, same purpose |
| Purpose | Educational, non-profit | Commercial |
| Amount Used | Small part | Whole work |
| Market Impact | Doesn’t hurt original market | Replaces original in market |
Even with these guidelines, some cases are still fuzzy. Look at the ongoing Richard Prince vs. Donald Graham case over Prince’s Instagram Series. It shows just how complex fair use can be in appropriation art.
sbb-itb-738ac1e
Legal Risks and Management
Possible Legal Issues
Using copyrighted material under fair use isn’t risk-free. Copyright holders might challenge your claim, leading to:
- Cease and desist letters
- Takedown notices
- Copyright infringement lawsuits
Legal action often kicks in when copying seems likely and the infringing content outranks the original on search engines.
Here’s a real-world example: In 2022, artists teamed up to take down a scam website using their work without permission. Their quick, coordinated reporting got the site removed in just four hours.
Creating Organizational Rules
Want to cut legal risks? Set up clear fair use guidelines:
1. Develop a fair use policy
Create a document that spells out how your organization handles fair use.
2. Train your team
Make sure everyone knows the basics of copyright law and fair use.
3. Set up a review process
Check potential fair use cases before you publish or use anything.
4. Keep records
Document your fair use decisions. It’ll show you did your homework if anyone challenges you.
5. Stay in the loop
Keep your policies up-to-date with new court decisions and copyright law changes.
Need a starting point? Check out the College Art Association’s Code of Best Practices for Fair Use in the Visual Arts. It covers five key areas:
| Area | What It’s About |
|---|---|
| Analytic Writing | Using copyrighted stuff in scholarly works |
| Teaching About Art | Using copyrighted works for education |
| Making Art | Fair use in creating and borrowing art |
| Museum Uses | How museums can display copyrighted works |
| Online Access | Fair use in digital archives and collections |
Patricia Aufderheide, Director of the Center for Media and Social Impact at American University, says:
"Codes of Best Practices have proven enormously successful in enabling members of other creative communities to do their work well and effectively. They allow individuals to make judgments knowing where they fall in relation to the thinking of their peers, and that lowers risk."
Fair Use Examples in Visual Arts
Important Court Cases
Let’s look at three court cases that shaped fair use in visual arts:
1. Blanch v. Koons (2006)
Jeff Koons used Andrea Blanch’s photo in his "Niagara" collage. The court sided with Koons:
"Koons used Blanch’s image as ‘raw material’ for social commentary."
This case highlighted transformative use in fair use analysis.
2. Cariou v. Prince (2013)
Richard Prince used Patrick Cariou’s photos in his paintings. The court ruled most of Prince’s works as fair use:
"manifested an entirely different aesthetic from Cariou’s photographs, making them unrecognizable."
This ruling reinforced the importance of transformative use.
3. Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (2023)
This Supreme Court case involved Warhol’s use of Lynn Goldsmith’s Prince photo. The Court ruled against fair use:
"The more transformative the new work, the less will be the significance of other factors, like commercialism, that may weigh against a finding of fair use."
This 7-2 decision showed that transformative use is just one factor in fair use analysis.
Key Takeaways
- Transformative use is crucial
- Commercial purpose matters
- Courts consider all four fair use factors
- Fair use is determined case-by-case
- When in doubt, get a license
Fair Use Analysis Tools
Want to figure out if your use of copyrighted material is fair? There are some handy tools and guidelines to help you out.
Evaluation Aids
Here are three useful tools:
- Fair Use Evaluator: From the American Library Association. It spits out a time-stamped PDF – handy if someone questions your fair use claim.
- Fair Use Checklist: Columbia University Library‘s tool focuses on key fair use factors. Great for documenting your thought process.
- Thinking Through Fair Use: The University of Minnesota Libraries‘ guide walks you through the assessment.
How to use these tools? Simple:
- Do a separate evaluation for each use case
- Keep records of your decisions
- If it’s not fair use, ask for permission
Industry Guidelines
Visual arts organizations have their own fair use guidelines:
| Organization | Guideline | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Resources Association | Statement on Fair Use of Images | 2011 |
| College Art Association | Code of Best Practices in Fair Use | 2015 |
| Association of Art Museum Directors | Guidelines for Copyrighted Materials Use | 2017 |
These cover specific areas like:
- Writing about art
- Art education
- Creating new artworks
- Museum practices
- Digital archives
But here’s the kicker: These tools and guidelines are helpful, but they’re not legal advice. Only a court can make the final call on fair use.
Conclusion
Fair use in visual arts is tricky. It lets artists get creative while following copyright laws. But it’s not always clear-cut.
The College Art Association’s Code of Best Practices is a big help. It covers:
- Writing about art
- Teaching art
- Making new art
- Museum work
- Online archives
But remember: these are just guidelines, not laws. Only courts can make the final call on fair use.
Recent court cases have shaken things up:
| Case | Year | Result | What It Means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warhol v. Goldsmith | 2023 | Not fair use | Adding new stuff doesn’t automatically make it fair use |
| Hachette v. Internet Archive | 2023 | Not fair use | Limits on digital library lending |
These cases show fair use is always changing, especially with new tech.
Stay in the Loop
If you’re in visual arts, you need to keep up with fair use. Here’s how:
- Follow arts groups like the College Art Association
- Talk to arts librarians about image rights
- Watch for new fair use court cases
- Check your own fair use practices often
"I believe in Fair Use and I wanted to protect the rights of all artists." – Shepard Fairey
Fairey’s words show why fair use matters for art. By staying informed and using fair use wisely, we can keep art thriving while respecting creators’ rights.
FAQs
What is fair use in the visual arts?
Fair use lets artists use copyrighted works without permission in certain cases. It’s all about:
- Creating new art from existing works
- Commenting on current culture
- Making artistic, political, or social statements
The American Alliance of Museums puts it this way:
"Artists may employ fair use to build on preexisting works, engage with contemporary culture, or provide artistic, political, or social commentary."
Fair use also helps art education and research by improving access to archives. This can spark new creative works too.
What art is not protected by copyright?
Some art doesn’t get copyright protection:
| Art Type | Copyright Status | Other Protection? |
|---|---|---|
| Common symbols (smiley faces, hearts) | Not protected | None |
| Typography | Not protected | None |
| Very simple works (basic word logos) | Might not be protected | Maybe trademark |
| Minimalist art | Might not be protected | Maybe trademark |
Keep in mind: Even without copyright, some of these might be protected by trademark law.
